Thread shape, cortical bone thickness, and magnitude and distribution of stress caused by the loading of orthodontic miniscrews: finite element analysis

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 12367 (2022) Cite this article

1148 Accesses

1 Citations

Metrics details

Cortical bone thickness is assumed to be a major factor regulating miniscrew stability. We investigated stress distribution in two miniscrews with different thread shapes (type A and B) and in cortical bone of three different thicknesses using three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models. More specifically, 3D FE models of two different miniscrews were created and placed obliquely or vertically into a cylindrical bone model representing different cortical bone thicknesses. When force was applied to the miniscrew, the stress distribution on the screw surface and in the peri-implant bone was assessed using FE methodology. Miniscrew safety was evaluated using a modified Soderberg safety factor. Screw head displacement increased with a decrease in cortical bone thickness, irrespective of screw type. The smallest minimum principal stresses on the screw surfaces remained constant in type A miniscrews on changes in cortical bone thickness. Minimum principal stresses also appeared on the cortical bone surface. Lower absolute values of minimum principal stresses were seen in type A miniscrews when placed vertically and with upward traction in obliquely placed type B miniscrews. Both miniscrews had acceptable safety factor values. Taken together, orthodontists should select and use the suitable miniscrew for each patient in consideration of bone properties.

In clinical orthodontics, miniscrews are implanted directly into the bone and offer absolute anchorage for different types of tooth movement1,2. They also provide biocompatibility, reduced discomfort, less invasiveness, and few limitations in placement as compared with miniplates3,4. Notwithstanding their small diameter and short length, miniscrews are an efficient modality available within modern orthodontic treatment1,2,5. For these reasons, miniscrews are widely accepted by both orthodontists and patients6,7.

On the other hand, the clinical use of miniscrews carries some risks and concerns. Screw failure might be one of the most undesirable adverse effects in the clinical use of miniscrews8. Even adequately placed miniscrews may fail. The success rate of miniscrews has been reported to be approximately 80%8. When considering the higher success rate of dental implants (which is reported to range from 96 to 99%), the failure rate of orthodontic miniscrews is comparably higher9. Moreover, screw failure is likely to occur early after placement. Thus, the primary stability is the most common parameter associated with screw failure and its enhancement is an urgent issue for clinical practitioners.

The primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews is associated with many factors9,10,11,12,13,14,15. For example, studies report that the primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews is closely related to the properties of the cortical bone, the screw design, inflammation in the peri-implant tissue, and the applied force16,17,18. Cortical bone fragility is generally assumed to be a major factor regulating miniscrew stability19,20, and cortical bone thickness is an essential factor in the successful placement of miniscrews as thinner cortical bone has insufficient primary stability21,22. Low bone density is another common cause of screw failure23.

Various clinical features can be simulated using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) models evaluating the distribution and magnitude of stress induced in the miniscrew and peri-implant bone. A high concentration of stress overloads the surrounding bone and stimulates bone microfracture in the region24. The distribution and magnitude of stress in the bone can be used to investigate the effectiveness of miniscrews and may be predictive of the risk of screw failure25,26,27. Ghorbanyjavadpour et al.28 investigated the stress produced during miniscrew insertion into bone using a 3-D FE model and suggested that most stress and strain was well tolerated by the cortical bone, but not by the cancellous bone. However, little information is available about the effects of cortical bone thickness on stress distribution and screw stability.

Previously, we evaluated the effects of cortical bone thickness on the mechanical stability of miniscrews in an in vitro study and found that the mechanical stability of miniscrews increased when the screws were inserted into a thicker articular bone block29,30. However, mechanical properties were found to differ meaningfully between miniscrews with different thread shapes, irrespective of the cortical bone thickness 30. Thus, this research aimed to evaluate the stress distribution in two types of miniscrews with different thread shapes as well as in surrounding bone with three different thicknesses of cortical bone when miniscrews were inserted vertically or obliquely; these parameters were evaluated using 3-D FE models.

In the present study, we adopted two different titanium miniscrews with the same screw length and diameter: type A (AbsoAnchor, SH1615-07; Dentos Ltd., Daegu, South Korea) and type B (B-max Screw, Type-TK; BIODENT Co., Tokyo, Japan) miniscrews. Both miniscrews were made of titanium alloy (6AL-4V ELI) and had a screw length of 7.0 mm and a screw diameter of 1.6 mm. The yield stress of the titanium alloy was reported to be 755 MPa, and the fatigue endurance limit was 412.5 MPa31.

The type A miniscrew had a shaft length of 5.5 mm (the pitch and depth of a traditional thread with a buttress reverse thread shape), with a taper of 1.30°. Micro-computed tomographic (CT) images were acquired with a cubic voxel of 5 μm3, and serial images of 845 consecutive slices were used to reconstruct the 3-D surface model using a CT modeler (Toshiba IT & Control Systems Co., Tokyo, Japan); 3-D finite elemental models of the type A miniscrew were constructed from the segmental images.

The type B miniscrew had a shaft length of 5.2 mm, a pitch of 0.5 mm, a depth of 0.2 mm, and a taper of 2.0°. The screw thread was characterized according to a 35° proximal half angle and a 10° distal half angle; 3-D FE models of the type B miniscrews were created using computer-aided design data provided by BIODENT Co., Ltd.

The peri-implant bone model had a cylindrical shape. It consisted of cortical bone and cancellous bone layers. Three peri-implant bone models were created to represent cortical bone thicknesses of 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 3.0 mm, and cancellous bone thicknesses of 5.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 4.0 mm, respectively (Fig. 1). The miniscrew models were placed to a depth of 5.5 mm. These miniscrew models were constructed to represent screw placement orientations of 0° (vertical direction) and 30° (oblique direction) against the cortical bone surface (Fig. 1). Twelve models were meshed with delta cone tetrahedrons representing the cortical and cancellous bones using HyperWorks software (Altair Engineering, Troy, MI, USA).

Schematic illustration of 3D finite element models for the evaluated miniscrews. The modeled cortical bone had a thickness of 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, or 3.0 mm. The orthodontic miniscrews were placed at a direction of 0° or 30°.

All solid elements were isotropic, homogeneous, and linear elastic. Table 1 shows the mechanical properties of the cortical and cancellous bone and of the miniscrews31,32,33,34. As the boundary condition, the bottom and the peripheral edge of the bone model were constrained for all degrees of freedom in order to avoid any movements of the entire model. The interfaces between the miniscrew and cortical and cancellous bones were established with nonfrictional contact elements. Due to these elements, the two contacting surfaces were able to move independently and without penetration.

For the loading condition, orthodontic force was applied at the center of the screw head hole in four different directions in each model (Fig. 1). The amount of traction force was 2 N, which is similar to the force commonly applied to miniscrews during orthodontic tooth movements35,36. The direction of force application was defined with respect to the cortical bone surface. The principal stresses were calculated for all nodes of the screw and bone. The distribution of stress in the surrounding bone and on the screw surface as well as the displacement of the point of the screw head where the load had been applied were evaluated using the FE analysis program Nastran (Autodesk Nastran version 2018, Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA).

Localized stress concentration causes fatigue failure of titanium alloy products37. Failure can occur under tension and/or compression conditions, particularly when tension and/or compression are applied in less mechanically demanding regions38,39. Thus, to evaluate the fatigue life of the miniscrews under variable loading directions, the local Soderberg safety factors (Sf) were calculated at the point wherein the greatest maximum principal stress was induced according to the following formula, considering both the first and third principal stresses (δI and δIII) indicating the maximum principal tensile and compressive stresses, respectively40:

where \(\delta_{a} = \left| {\delta_{I} {-}\delta_{III} } \right|/{2}\) represents the stress amplitude and δm = (δI + δIII)/2 represents the mean stress. Moreover, δf and δy represent the fatigue endurance limit and yield stress for the titanium alloy (6AL-4V ELI), respectively.

Regardless of the insertion direction and screw type, we found that screw head displacement increased as the cortical bone thickness decreased (Fig. 2). Moreover, type A miniscrews showed larger displacement than did type B miniscrews under the corresponding condition.

Displacement of the loading points. Type A miniscrew: ○ vertical insertion, △ oblique insertion. Type B miniscrew: ● vertical insertion, ▲ oblique insertion. Upward Downward Left-side Right-side.

When miniscrews were placed vertically, the screw head was displaced similarly regardless of the loading direction. When the cortical bone was 1.5 mm thick, the screw head displacement was 0.0053 mm and 0.0042 mm on average in type A and B miniscrews, respectively. On the other hand, when the miniscrew was placed obliquely, the screw head displacement was smallest with upward traction, irrespective of the screw type and cortical bone thickness. When loading was applied upward, the displacement of the screw head was 0.0036–0.0039 mm in type A miniscrews. In type B miniscrews, the displacement was 0.0028–0.0036 mm.

Figure 3 and Table 2 show the representative figurations of the maximum and minimum principal stresses and the values of greatest maximum and smallest minimum principal stresses, respectively. When the screws were inserted vertically, both the greatest maximum and smallest minimum principal stresses were located at the first or second thread. Moreover, the maximum and minimum principal stresses extended throughout the fifth or sixth thread regardless of the screw type and loading direction. In addition, in type A miniscrews, the absolute values of smallest minimum principal stresses remained virtually constant (ranging from 38.4 to 60.5 MPa) regardless of the thickness of the cortical bone. In type B miniscrews, these values ranged from 26.3 to 59.9 MPa and were lower than those observed for type A miniscrews.

Distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses on the miniscrew surface on the loaded side when the miniscrew was placed vertically or obliquely in a model of 2.0 mm thick cortical bone.

When miniscrews were implanted obliquely, the maximum and minimum principal stresses also spread widely, and the smallest minimum principal stress concentrated on the first or second thread. The absolute value of smallest minimum principal stress was smallest with upward traction, irrespective of the cortical bone thickness and the screw type. The absolute value of smallest minimum principal stress was smaller for type B miniscrews (mean, 31.0 MPa) than for type A miniscrews (mean, 38.7 MPa). Moreover, for type B miniscrews, when traction force was applied upward, the values representing the absolute value of smallest minimum principal stresses decreased as the cortical bone became thicker. When loading was applied in any other direction, the values representing the greatest maximum and smallest minimum principal stresses were almost identical irrespective of the cortical bone thickness and the screw type.

The greatest maximum principal stress was concentrated on the surface of the cortical bone corresponding to the first or second screw thread (Fig. 4 and Table 3). When the miniscrew was placed vertically, the greatest maximum principal stresses showed relatively small changes compared to the smallest minimum principal stresses (which ranged from 4.3 to 8.2 MPa) irrespective of the screw type, force direction, and cortical bone thickness.

Schema of greatest maximum and smallest minimum principal stresses on the surface of cortical bone when the miniscrew was placed vertically or obliquely in each cortical bone thickness. (A) Type A miniscrew, (B) Type B miniscrew. Arrows indicate the loading direction.

The smallest minimum principal stresses also appeared on the cortical bone surface corresponding to the first screw thread (Fig. 4). In both miniscrew types, the smallest minimum principal stress varied largely, ranging from − 25.8 to − 10.5 MPa. When type A miniscrews were placed vertically, the absolute values of the minimum principal stresses were greater with upward and right-side traction (as compared to those with downward and left-side traction) regardless of the cortical bone thickness. As the cortical bone became thicker, the absolute values of the minimum principal stresses did not increase given any direction of force application. When type B miniscrews were placed vertically, the absolute values of the smallest minimum principal stresses were larger than those of type A miniscrews. When type A miniscrews were placed obliquely, the absolute values of the minimum principal stress were smaller with downward traction compared to those with traction in any other direction. This trend was independent of the cortical bone thickness (Fig. 4). When comparing the two different miniscrews under vertical placement conditions, the absolute values for minimum principal stress were lower for type A miniscrews than for type B miniscrews in all force directions. When the miniscrews were placed obliquely, type B miniscrews exhibited smaller absolute values for minimum principal stress with upward traction.

Soderberg safety factors were computed at the point where the greatest maximum principal stress was induced. Regardless of screw type and cortical bone thickness, these values remained almost constant when the miniscrews were implanted vertically (Fig. 5). When the screws were implanted obliquely, the Soderberg safety factor values were dependent on the direction of force application.

Soderberg safety factor values for different types of miniscrews when the miniscrew (placed vertically or obliquely) was loaded in various directions. (A) Type A miniscrew, (B) Type B miniscrew. 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm.

For type A miniscrews, the minimum safety factor was 6.8 around the second screw thread when the miniscrew was implanted obliquely into cortical bone with a 1.5 mm thickness and with right-side traction, while the maximum safety factor was 9.4 around the second screw thread when the screw was implanted obliquely into cortical bone with a 3.0 mm thickness and with upward traction. When the miniscrews were placed obliquely, the greatest Soderberg safety factor value was detected with upward traction regardless of the cortical bone thickness.

For type B miniscrews, the minimum safety factor was 7.9 around the third thread when the screw was inserted obliquely into cortical bone with a 2.0 mm thickness and with downward traction, while the largest safety factor was 14.0 around the first thread when the screw was placed obliquely into cortical bone with a 2.0 mm thickness and with upward traction. The Soderberg safety factor values were larger than those of type A miniscrews under the corresponding condition. When the miniscrews were placed obliquely, the maximum and minimum safety factor values were found upon upward and downward traction, respectively.

In the clinic, orthodontists often face situations that require tooth intrusion, such as incisor intrusion in cases of deep bite with gummy smile, molar intrusion in cases of anterior open bite, and correction of the canted occlusal plane, among other clinical situations. To treat these malocclusions, obliquely inserted miniscrews with upward traction can be considered effective under orthodontic loading41. The present study assessed the magnitude and distribution of stress induced in two types of miniscrews with different thread shapes and in peri-implant bone with three different thicknesses of cortical bone using 3D FE models. We found lower absolute values of minimum principal stress when type A miniscrews were placed vertically, when type B miniscrews were placed obliquely, and under upward traction. Both miniscrews had acceptable safety factor values.

To date, various types of miniscrews have been developed and distributed worldwide; their length ranges from 5 to 12 mm, and their diameter ranges from 1.3 to 2.0 mm8. Only type B miniscrew used in this study has a different thread shape. The present study evaluated the stress distribution in the two miniscrews with different thread shape and in cortical bone using 3D FE models, and our results indicated the effect of thread shape on the safety and initial stability of the miniscrew. However, since there may be another miniscrew that may show better performance than the two miniscrews used in this study, further investigations using much more types of miniscrews are required to determine the optimal design of miniscrew for the advantage of safety and secure stability.

Since miniscrews are commonly used for approximately 2 years during orthodontic treatment, fatigue behavior must be considered during the design phase of these structures in regard to adequate estimation of safety factors and lifetime42. In the present study, we adopted the Soderberg approach to compute safety factors under fatigue loads43,44. A safety factor of 2.0 indicates that a miniscrew could withstand a stress level two times greater than that which it would realistically meet in its lifetime44. In the present study, although type A miniscrews revealed slightly lower design safety factor values, the safety factor values were acceptable for both types of miniscrews. This indicates that both types of miniscrews were appropriately designed to prevent screw fracture and to improve screw performance during orthodontic treatment. Not all miniscrew designs can be utilized in all patients due to individual differences in cortical bone thickness and bone density. Therefore, different types of miniscrews are commercially available, such as cylindrical and tapered miniscrews and stainless-steel and titanium alloy miniscrews. In addition, in this study, regardless of the screw type, we found that Soderberg safety factor values were greatest with upward traction when miniscrews were implanted obliquely. Therefore, it is advisable to adopt oblique insertion of the miniscrew in order to prevent its fracture.

The primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews is closely related to the thickness of the surrounding cortical bone16,30,39. Han et al.30 indicated that the mechanical stability of miniscrews increased when miniscrews were installed in artificial bone blocks of the same density but greater thickness. Our results showed that the displacement of the screw head was greater when the miniscrews were placed in a bone model with a thinner cortical bone layer than in bone models with a thicker cortical bone layer, irrespective of the miniscrew type. Moreover, the type A miniscrew showed greater displacement of the screw head than did the type B miniscrew. This is due to differences in the height from the cortical bone surface to the loading point, which causes differences in the center of gravity of the miniscrew. Regarding the stress distribution on the surface of the miniscrew, the smallest minimum principal stress remained almost constant when the miniscrew was placed vertically regardless of cortical bone thickness, indicating that the minimum principal stress induced on the surface of the screw thread is insulated from the effect of cortical bone thickness. Moreover, when type A miniscrews were placed obliquely, the values of the smallest minimum principal stresses on the screw surface remained steady irrespective of the cortical bone thickness, although the absolute value of the smallest minimum principal stress was smallest with upward traction. In type B miniscrews, the absolute values of the smallest minimum principal stresses were 5–30% smaller than those in type A miniscrews. Moreover, the absolute value of the smallest minimum principal stress was the smallest when type B miniscrews were placed obliquely and with upward traction.

In addition, as the cortical bone became thicker, the maximum and absolute value of minimum principal stresses decreased markedly. This may be because the active contact area between the miniscrew and the cortical bone increased when the miniscrew was implanted obliquely and with upward traction. This increase in the contact area between the miniscrew and cortical bone results in a widespread distribution of the applied force and reduces the stress concentration. Pan et al.45 reported that the cortical bone thickness at an angle of 30° against the long axis of the tooth was approximately 1.5 times larger than that at an angle of 90°. Previously, we evaluated the influence of placement angles ranging from 0° to 45° on the initial stability of type A miniscrew and demonstrated that the stresses in the surrounding cortical bone increased with the angle of insertion41. This indicates that, as the insertion angle increases, the contact area between screw surface and cortical bone increases with the increment of the peak stresses due to the shortening of the moment arm. Taken together, when placing miniscrews at a thinner cortical bone site, oblique insertion of the type B miniscrew presents the advantage of providing sufficient anchorage and primary stability. On the other hand, stability is likely to be achieved irrespective of the force direction when type A miniscrews are placed vertically.

In comparing the two different types of miniscrews, we found that the absolute values of the minimum principal stresses were reduced by 80–90% when type B miniscrews were placed obliquely and with upward traction as compared to type A miniscrews. This implies that, when type B miniscrews are placed, the induced stresses extended widely to the surrounding bone. This might be due to the unique thread shape of type B miniscrews. The screw thread of type B miniscrews is designed to set the proximal half angle to 35° and the distal half angle to 10°. Moreover, a previous study reported that when the proximal half angle was increased from 0° (vertically facing) to 30° (obliquely facing), the pulling strength of metal miniscrews increased by 16% and the pull-out force was evenly transduced to the peri-implant bone46. In addition, as compared to type A miniscrews with a conventional thread shape, type B miniscrews have a wider area in contact with the cortical bone when a pull-out force is exerted on the miniscrew. The proximal surface of the screw thread plays an important role in resistance against a pull-out force applied to the miniscrew. Therefore, primary stability may be enhanced by a unique thread shape in order to keep bone damage to a minimum, particularly when miniscrews are implanted obliquely.

Biomechanical models of living tissue are highly imperfect as they are based on a number of assumptions and simplifications. With respect to the present analysis, the following considerations should be described. First, the structures of the bone were modeled using isotropic material and a constant value of Young’s modulus over its whole thickness. In addition, there was no interface between cortical and trabecular bones. It was recently reported that the magnitude and modulus gradient of fascicular elastin in living tendon could contribute to the tensile mechanical response of the tendon, likely by regulating collagen engagement under load47. This means that a detailed representation of the material properties of the bone (anisotropy, the architecture of the cancellous bone, a discontinuous interface between the two bones) should be accounted for. Second, the contact between the miniscrew and the surrounding bone was established as a nonfrictional surface interface. However, in general, a certain amount of friction is present at the contact surfaces because the removal torque is greater than zero when the miniscrews are removed during and after orthodontic treatment48. Therefore, the results obtained in this study cannot be directly transferred to clinical practice without additional serious consideration informed by future rigorous research.

Herein, we showed that type A miniscrews demonstrate the advantage of safety and secure stability when the screw is placed vertically, while type B miniscrews show the benefit of stress reduction when the screw is placed obliquely and with upward traction. Taken together, these data indicate that orthodontists should select and use the miniscrew most suitable for each patient in consideration of their bone properties.

The data used for this study, though not available in a public repository, will be made available to other researchers upon reasonable request.

Kuroda, S. & Tanaka, E. Usage of TADs for treatment of adult Class III malocclusion. Semin. Orthod. 17, 91–97 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Kuroda, S., Sugawara, Y., Deguchi, T., Kyung, H. M. & Takano-Yamamoto, T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 131, 9–15 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Finke, H., Koos, B., Fischer-Brandies, H. & Es-Souni, M. In vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrews with human gingival fibroblast and SAOS-2 osteoblast cultures. J. Orofac. Orthop. 79, 328–336 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Galeotti, A. et al. Effects of pH on in vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Prog. Orthod. 14, 15 (2013).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wilmes, B., Ottenstreuer, S., Su, Y. Y. & Drescher, D. Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J. Orofac. Orthop. 69, 42–50 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kyung, H. M., Park, H. S., Bae, S. M., Sung, J. H. & Kim, I. B. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J. Clin. Orthod. 37, 321–328 (2003).

PubMed Google Scholar

Sakai, Y., Kuroda, S., Murshid, S. A. & Takano-Yamamoto, T. Skeletal Class III severe openbite treatment using implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 78, 157–166 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kuroda, S. & Tanaka, E. Risks and complications of miniscrew anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 50, 79–85 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Papageorgiou, S. N., Zogakis, I. P. & Papadopoulos, M. A. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 142, 577–595 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Ozdemir, F., Tozlu, M. & Cakan, D. G. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 143, 190–196 (2013).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Shah, A. H., Behrents, R. G., Kim, K. B., Kyung, H. M. & Buschang, P. H. Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength. Angle Orthod. 82, 603–610 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wu, T. Y., Kuang, S. H. & Wu, C. H. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: A study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 67, 1595–1599 (2009).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Lee, N. K. & Baek, S. H. Effects of the diameter and shape of orthodontic mini-implants on microdamage to the cortical bone. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 138(8), e1-8 (2010).

Google Scholar

Çehreli, S. & Özçırpıcı, A. A. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 141, 187–195 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Cha, J. Y., Kil, J. K., Yoon, T. M. & Hwang, C. J. Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 137, 73–79 (2010).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Holmgren, E. P., Seckinger, R. J., Kilgren, L. M. & Mante, F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis: A two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J. Oral. Implantol. 24, 80–88 (1998).

2.3.CO;2" data-track-action="article reference" href="https://doi.org/10.1563%2F1548-1336%281998%29024%3C0080%3AEPOODI%3E2.3.CO%3B2" aria-label="Article reference 16" data-doi="10.1563/1548-1336(1998)0242.3.CO;2">Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Motoyoshi, M., Yoshida, T., Ono, A. & Shimizu, N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implant. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Imp. 22, 779–784 (2007).

Google Scholar

Mesa, F. et al. Multivariate study of factors influencing primary dental implant stability. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 19, 196–200 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Huja, S. S., Litsky, A. S., Beck, F. M., Johnson, K. A. & Larsen, P. E. Pullout strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 127, 307–313 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Motoyoshi, M., Hirabayashi, M., Uemura, M. & Shimizu, N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 17, 109–114 (2006).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Ono, A., Motoyoshi, M. & Shimizu, N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 37, 334–340 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Motoyoshi, M., Inaba, M., Ono, A. & Shimizu, N. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 38, 13–18 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tolstunov, L. Implant zones of the jaws: Implant location and related success rate. J. Oral. Implantol. 33, 211–220 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Salmória, K. K. et al. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 133(790), e15-22 (2008).

Google Scholar

Lin, T. S., Tsai, F. D., Chen, C. Y. & Lin, L. W. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to the orthodontic anchorage mini-implant with finite element analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 143, 182–189 (2013).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Yépez, J. E., Marangon, R. M., Saga, A. Y., de Lima, K. F. & Tanaka, O. M. Miniscrew composition, transmucosal profile, and cortical bone thickness: A three-dimensional finite-element analysis of stress fields. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 19, 881–887 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Hirai, Y. et al. Influence of insertion depth on stress distribution in orthodontic miniscrew and the surrounding bone by finite element analysis. Dent. Mater. J. 40, 1270–1276 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Ghorbanyjavadpour, F., Kazemi, P., Moradinezhad, M. & Rakhshan, V. Distribution and amount of stresses caused by insertion or removal of orthodontic miniscrews into the maxillary bone: A finite element analysis. Int. Orthod. 17, 758–763 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Watanabe, K. et al. Mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrew depends on a thread shape. J. Dent. Sci. 17, 1244–1252 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Han, C. M. et al. Evaluation of miniscrew type-dependent mechanical stability. Clin. Biomech. 69, 21–27 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

The Japan Titanium Society. https://titan-japan.com/indexe.htm (2002).

Dechow, P. C., Panagiotopoulou, O. & Gharpure, P. Biomechanical implications of cortical elastic properties of the macaque mandible. Zoology 124, 3–12 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Öhman, C. et al. Compressive behaviour of child and adult cortical bone. Bone 49, 769–776 (2011).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bini, F., Marinozzi, A., Marinozzi, F. & Patane, F. Microtensile measurements of single trabeculae stiffness in human femur. J. Biomech. 35, 1515–1519 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Cornelis, M. A., Scheffler, N. R., De Clerck, H. J., Tulloch, J. F. & Behets, C. N. Systemic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 131, S52–S58 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Barlow, M. & Kula, K. Factors influencing efficiency of sliding mechanics to close extraction space: A systematic review. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 11, 65–73 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Edwards, P. & Ramulu, M. Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 598, 327–337 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Choy, S. Y., Sun, C. N., Leong, K. F. & Wei, J. Compressive properties of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting: Design, orientation and density. Addit. Manuf. 16, 213–224 (2017).

CAS Google Scholar

Li, S. J. et al. Compression fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V mesh arrays fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 60, 793–802 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Senalp, A. Z., Kayabasi, O. & Kurataran, H. Static, dynamic and fatigue behavior of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Mater. Des. 28, 1577–1583 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kuroda, S., Inoue, M., Kyung, H. M., Koolstra, J. H. & Tanaka, E. Stress distribution in obliquely inserted orthodontic miniscrews evaluated by three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Imp. 32, 344–349 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Marquezan, M., Mattos, C. T., Sant’Anna, E. F. & Maia, L. C. Does cortical bone thickness influence the primary stability of miniscrews? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 84, 1093–1103 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zaretsky, E. V. Fatigue criterion to system design, life, and reliability. J. Propuls. Power 3, 76–83 (1987).

Article Google Scholar

Mehboob, H. et al. A novel design, analysis and 3D printing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy bio-inspired porous femoral stem. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 31, 78 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pan, C. Y. et al. Effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J. Dent. Sci. 14, 383–388 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Mori, R., Ozoe, N., Nakai, T. & Uchio, Y. Proximal half angle of the screw thread is a critical design variable affecting the pull-out strength of cancellous bone screws. Clin. Biomech. 24, 781–785 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Eekhoff, J. D. et al. Fascicular elastin within tendon contributes to the magnitude and modulus gradient of the elastic stress response across tendon type and species. Acta Biomater. S1742–7061, 00156–00158 (2022).

Google Scholar

Inoue, M. et al. Torque ratio as a predictable factor on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Implant Dent. 3, 576–581 (2014).

Google Scholar

Download references

We thank Dr. Takashi Ihara and Kanji Ueda at Digital Solutions Inc. (DSi, Hiroshima, Japan) for their invaluable technical software assistance with the FE analysis and Dr. Nobuyasu Horimai for donating funds from a research grant.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School of Oral Sciences, Tokushima, Japan

Takuma Sakamaki

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8504, Japan

Keiichiro Watanabe, Akihiko Iwasa, Shinya Horiuchi & Eiji Tanaka

Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Toru Deguchi

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

T.S., K.W., A.I., and E.T. conceived and designed the research, T.S., K.W., and E.T. performed the research, T.S., K.W. and S.H. analyzed the data, and S.T., T.D., and E.T. wrote the manuscript.

Correspondence to Keiichiro Watanabe.

ET received patent royalty from BIODENT Co. All other authors state that they have no actual or potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Sakamaki, T., Watanabe, K., Iwasa, A. et al. Thread shape, cortical bone thickness, and magnitude and distribution of stress caused by the loading of orthodontic miniscrews: finite element analysis. Sci Rep 12, 12367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16662-w

Download citation

Received: 22 March 2022

Accepted: 13 July 2022

Published: 20 July 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16662-w

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.